Question on AD-DMZ to accomodate SQL and other servers

I am planning to setup servers on the DMZ (published by ISA 2004).
The problem is this:
If I setup SQL servers in a cluster in the DMZ, I see that Microsoft Cluster
Services setup would require a domain account. That said it seems I would
need to setup a domain+forest to give me more flexibility to setup servers
in the DMZ instead of using a workgroup configuration.
Question is this, I would need at least two domain controllers in the DMZ to
put a decent domain in place and provide adequate redundancy in case of one
of the DC's go down.
Instead of setting such domain/forest, could I use ADAM to get this task of
AD-DMZ accomplished ?Ho
No. You need a full domain with DC's. ADAM is too lightweight and does not
supply the functionality required by the servers.
Regards-
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Mr. Magoo" <maggo@.nospasm.com> wrote in message
news:eXuq$ASfFHA.2496@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>I am planning to setup servers on the DMZ (published by ISA 2004).
> The problem is this:
> If I setup SQL servers in a cluster in the DMZ, I see that Microsoft
> Cluster Services setup would require a domain account. That said it seems
> I would need to setup a domain+forest to give me more flexibility to setup
> servers in the DMZ instead of using a workgroup configuration.
> Question is this, I would need at least two domain controllers in the DMZ
> to put a decent domain in place and provide adequate redundancy in case of
> one of the DC's go down.
> Instead of setting such domain/forest, could I use ADAM to get this task
> of AD-DMZ accomplished ?
>