Showing posts with label installing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label installing. Show all posts

Monday, March 26, 2012

Question on where the MDX is deployed to by BIDS Helper

Hi, all experts here,

As we are enabled to deploy the calculation MDX scripts by installing BIDS Helper. But why there is no options for us to decide where the MDX scripts will be deployed to? And where can I find those deployed MDX scripts? Thanks a lot in advance and I am confused and I am looking forward to hearing from you shortly for your help. (Assume I am right, to my understanding, with capability to deploy the calculated MDX scripts we are then able to reuse them?)

With best regards,

Yours sincerely,

Helen999888 wrote:

But why there is no options for us to decide where the MDX scripts will be deployed to?

Because It is deployed to the server and database that is specified in the deployment settings of your project. Which should be the same server that the cube was deployed to in the first place.

Helen999888 wrote:

And where can I find those deployed MDX scripts?

The MDX script is the calculation script that you find in the calculations tab of the cube designer. The deploy calculations feature pushes changes from your client machine up onto the server.

Helen999888 wrote:

(Assume I am right, to my understanding, with capability to deploy the calculated MDX scripts we are then able to reuse them?)

No, the MDX calculations are not persisted anywhere, the xmla alter commands are sent directly to the target server specified in the deployment settings for your project. The xmla command is targeted at a specific DatabaseID and CubeID and usually the calculations would be fairly specific to the structure of the cube.

The main advantage to using the deploy MDX script feature is that it is very quick if you know that all you have done is to make a change to the MDX script.

|||

Hi, Darren,

Thanks very much for your kind advices.

As you advised, all the point of using this feature is to quickly deploy changes of calculations to the analysis services database for the specific cube? Thanks a lot.

With best regards,

Yours sincerely,

Friday, March 9, 2012

Question on installing the SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition on the Windows Vista

I cannot find any specific info on the support of SQL server 2005 developer edition on different Windows Vista. Does anyone have any experience? TIAjust refer, http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143506.aspx|||My experience is very problematical. I've tried installing it several times on my new Vista 64 Ultimate machine, and each time I wind up with only the Express edition, not the full/Enterprise edition as I was able to do on my prior XP Professional machine. Being limited to Express is a problem, since the test database I have from my client exceeds the 4GB threshold that the Express Edition imposes. If anyone has had better luck, or knows hoow to do this better, I'd love to hear about it.

Question on Installing Named Instance

Does anyone know if a named instance can be installed without having to
reboot the server right away? Would like to install it now but schedule a
reboot when it would be more convienent.
ThanksForgot to mention, will be installing SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition with
SP3a on Windows Server 2003 Standard edition.
"MACason" wrote:
> Does anyone know if a named instance can be installed without having to
> reboot the server right away? Would like to install it now but schedule a
> reboot when it would be more convienent.
> Thanks

Question on Installing Named Instance

Does anyone know if a named instance can be installed without having to
reboot the server right away? Would like to install it now but schedule a
reboot when it would be more convienent.
ThanksForgot to mention, will be installing SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition with
SP3a on Windows Server 2003 Standard edition.
"MACason" wrote:

> Does anyone know if a named instance can be installed without having to
> reboot the server right away? Would like to install it now but schedule a
> reboot when it would be more convienent.
> Thanks