Showing posts with label order. Show all posts
Showing posts with label order. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2012

question when using application role

Hi,
If i use application role...how do i pass the connection string in order
to connect to sql server? Can anyone give me an example?
--
Thanks a lot!
regards,
florenceleeWhen you use an application role, the app connects to the server in EXACTLY
the same way it would if there were NO appl role..
However AFTER the connection is made the app executes.
sp_Setapprole stored procedure, passing in the role name and password.
There is an example in books online. This causes the entire permission set
for the connection to be completely replaced by the permissions associated
with the role...
Hope this helps.
--
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Florencelee" <florencelee@.visualsolutions.com.my> wrote in message
news:etEWinVzEHA.2036@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> If i use application role...how do i pass the connection string in order
> to connect to sql server? Can anyone give me an example?
> --
> Thanks a lot!
> regards,
> florencelee
>

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

question regarding referenced views and replication order

You can update the view definition and hope that this updates the
dependencies correctly. If it doesn't you can use sp_addscriptexec to add
all the views in the correct order. Note that in SQL Server 2005 you can
specify the article order (@.processing_order) to get round this type of
issue.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
Stefan,
replication of views and procs doesn't follow the usual paradigm in
replication. Changes to these programming objects aren't picked up by the
log-reader, so we have to resort to some sort of manual solution to pick up
changes to replicated objects and apply them which ever way we go about it.
The script to generate the view creation scripts could be based on the view
definition - in which case it'll always be upto date if you even need to run
the whole thing again. Ad-hoc changes can meanwhile be done using individual
views.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Question on SQL Server2000s order by clause

Hi,
I have problem of order by clase.
Must I specify the column in both select clause and order by clause
so as to get the correct result?

If I omit the order by column in select clause(for example:
select order.*, cl.ID from T_ORDER order, T_CLIENT cl where ... order by cl.code),
would MS SQL server 2000 still correctly or ignore order by clause completely?


It seems the latter actually happens.

BTW, how would other DBMS handle this case?

Regards,
Justinin SQL the ORDER BY clause is independent of the actual query is so far as you can sort by a column that is not listed in the select list

for example

select fname , lastname, middle
from t1
order by zipcode

on a side note you can also order by the ordinal number of the columns in the result set but this is confusing and not good form

ex
select fname , lastname, middle
from t1
order by 2

does this answer your question?sql

Question on SQL Server 2000 - 2005

I am a DB2 DBA that has been asked to become familiar enough with SQL
Server in order to become actively involved in its installation,
implementation, and to review database backup/recovery procedures. SQL
Server will be used by a vendor packaged application.

The problem is that we are awaiting word on whether it will be SQL
Server 2000 or 2005 we will be working with. I have been told that
there are considerable differences between the two versions.

There is an upcoming local 5 day class on Administering SQL Server 2000
that I would like to take. (outline below)

Question is, are the differences between the two versions so drastic as
to render this class less than useful, especially in terms of
installation and basic db maintenance functions?

Many thanks in advance.
Gerry

Course Outline: 2072 Administering a Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Database

Lesson 1: SQL Server Overview

What Is SQL Server
SQL Server Integration
SQL Server Databases
SQL Server Security
Working with SQL Server

Top

Lesson 2: Planning to Install SQL Server

Hardware Installation Considerations
SQL Server 2000 Editions
Software Installation Considerations
Methods of Installing SQL Server
Verifying the Installation
Configuring SQL Server Enterprise Manager
Troubleshooting

Lesson 3: Managing Database Files

Introduction to Data Structures
Creating Databases
Managing Databases
Placing Database Files and Logs
Optimizing the Database Using Hardware-based RAID
Optimizing the Database Using Filegroups
Optimizing the Database Using Filegroups with Hardware-based
RAID
Capacity Planning
Performance Considerations

Lesson 4: Managing Security

Implementing an Authentication Mode
Assigning Logins to Users and Roles
Assigning Permissions to Users and Roles
Managing Security Within SQL Server
Managing Application Security
Managing SQL Server Security in the Enterprise

Lesson 5: Performing Administrative Tasks

Configuration Tasks
Routine SQL Server Administrative Tasks
Automating Routine Maintenance Tasks
Creating Alerts
Troubleshooting SQL Server Automation
Automating Multiserver Jobs

Top

Lesson 6: Backing Up Databases

Preventing Data Loss
Setting and Changing a Database Recovery Model
SQL Server Backup
When to Back Up Databases
Performing Backups
Types of Backup Methods
Planning a Backup Strategy
Performance Considerations

Lesson 7: Restoring Databases

SQL Server Recovery Process
Preparing to Restore a Database
Restoring Backups
Restoring Databases from Different Backup Types
Restoring Damaged System Databases

Lesson 8: Monitoring SQL Server for Performance

Why to Monitor SQL Server
Performance Monitoring and Tuning
Tools for Monitoring SQL Server
Common Monitoring and Tuning Tasks

Lesson 9: Transferring Data

Introduction to Transferring Data
Tools for Importing and Exporting Data in SQL Server
Introduction to DTS
Transforming Data with DTS

Top

Lesson 10: Maintaining High Availability

Introduction to Availability
Increasing Availability Using Failover Clustering
Standby Servers and Log Shipping

Lesson 11: Introducing Replication

Introduction to Distributed Data
Introduction to SQL Server Replication
SQL Server Replication Agents
SQL Server Replication Types
Physical Replication ModelsIn my humble opinion you better get training on SQL 2005. But knowledge
of SQL 2000 will add on to SQL 2005|||(datapro01@.yahoo.com) writes:
> Question is, are the differences between the two versions so drastic as
> to render this class less than useful, especially in terms of
> installation and basic db maintenance functions?

Everything that works in SQL 2000 works in SQL 2005, at least almost. But
SQL 2005 may offer new and better ways that what you learn on the SQL 2000
class.

The one area where the SQL 2000 class may be more confusing than helpful
if you settle on SQL 2005, is installation. The setup program is different,
there are different configuration issues etc.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@.sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pr...oads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodin...ions/books.mspx|||Thanks for the replies and the info. New Horizons is telling me that
the training materials for 2005 have not yet been released. At least to
them.

I will certainly do my best to understand the installation differences
between the versions.